(Agricultural Archaeology 1999(3):88-97. Scanned by Yiping Wu; ed./trans. by B. Gordon)
Abstract
(B.Gordon): Ancient paddy rice cultivation began 8000 years ago in E Dongshan Village, with phytoliths showing japonica. Tai Lake primitive agriculture has crucial significance in China paddy rice origin and spread.Keywords: Dongshan Village, Jiangsu, japonica, indica, Tai Lake, Caoxieshan, Majiabang, phytolith, sherd
The Dongshan Village sites are in E Dongshan Village 3 km S of Yangtze River and 18 km S of Zhangjiagang City, Jiangsu Province. They are on the E slope of Xiang Mountain (elev. 137 m), rising W and falling E and ca. 4 m above surrounding farmland. They measure 230x260 m in ca. 60,000 sq. m. In 1989, Suzhou Museum described a 2x5 m rice find in ditch 2. In 1990, a second excavation opened a 5x10 m rice part in the N site called T3, simultaneously opening a l0x10 m E rice find in ditch 1 (T4), for a total of 170 sq.m. Results show Majiabang and Songze cultural accumulations, the former primary, with thickest level >3 m. Dual cultural debris in grave 8, house 6, ashpit l, includes excavated pottery, jade carvings and ca. 300 stone tools.
Excavation shows 8 levels in the N side of T3 section (Table 1). Under the plowzone are grayish white and blue-black levels 2 & 3 above red-oxidized levels 4 & 6, over blue-brown and dark yellow level 5 & 7 on dark ashy level 8. C14-dated levels, with level 2 in Songze period and levels 3-8 in Majiabang period, show absolute dates of 6000-8000 years.
|
Lab. Ref. |
Search |
level |
Years (BP) |
Tree-ring adj.years (BP) |
|
BK90146 |
T3 |
5 |
5240±60 |
5875±74 |
|
BK90147 |
T3 |
5 |
5590±120 |
6245±170 |
|
BK90148 |
T3 |
7 |
6060±130 |
6715±77 |
|
BK90149 |
T3 |
8 |
7260±60 |
8060±60 |
|
BK90150 |
T4 |
6 |
5320±60 |
5960±74 |
Table l: C14 dates from Dongshan Village sites
Recently, the lower Yangtze has recurring finds of Neolithic paddy rice, with Chiangnan Suzhou's Caoxieshan rice paddy sites 6000 years old (1) (7) (8), and Gaoyoulong Village paddy rice sites N of the Yangtze 7000 years old (6) (10) (11). East Dongshan Village sites are on the Chiangnan border, their earliest thick accumulation being 8000 years old.
E Dongshan Village paddy rice extends new research on indica-japonica differentiation beyond earlier studies limited to carbonized rice. Despite thorough research on paddy rice origin using indica-japonica differentiation, carbonized rice use may have been fortuitous; i.e., findings show the error rate of its separation into indica & japonica approaches 39% (19). Thus, ancient paddy rice research has certain limitations.
Recently, leaf blade phytoliths were used in ancient paddy rice origin and spread using indica-japonica differentiation (1) (3) (6) (7) (10) (12) (13). They are physico-chemically stable even under organism oxygenolysis, not decomposing but becoming part of the soil and retaining original shape. Their number is quite high, each g of leaf blade having several tens of thousands. They separate into indica & japonica phytoliths accurate to >85% (2) (4) (5). Neolithic pots not only involve mixing straw with clay containing phytoliths, but are important in archaeological dating. Therefore, archaeological age of soil and sherd phytoliths may be used to determine paddy rice cultivation through phytolith quantity and shape. Ancient paddy rice research on phytoliths does not lose its effectiveness. Xiao Jiayi et al. (14) once searched each level of T3 and T4 in E Dongshan Village sites for phytoliths, but not could separate indica & japonica. This research uses red oxidized soil and potsherds from there to separate cultivated rice into indica & japonica.
Comparative analytical specimens are 3 soil samples (T3 levels 3, 5 & 8), 5 red oxidized soil samples [(T3 levels 3-6 and level 3(2)] and 23 sherds (T3 levels 2 (1), 4 (4), 5 (3), 6 (2) & 7 (1), plus T4 levels 2 (1), 5 (2), 6 (2), 7 (3) & 8 (4). Except T3 level 2, T4 level 2 and plowzone, all are Majiabang culture (Table 2).
(1) quantitative analysis
Phytolith quantitative analysis was done on 3 soil samples (15) (16), treated according to Hiroshi Fujiwara's method. 1 g samples of dry soil were powdered and put in 15 ml glass jars. One quota (by wt.) purified glass sand was used as quantitative frame of reference, with water added plus dispersal agent dropwise and processing 20 min. @ 250w, 38 kHz ultrasound to eliminate phytolith surface adsorption by glutinous grain. Particle size rejection was done according to the rule of precipitation; <10µm small granule and other impurities. After final drying, samples were examined under SEM.
Specific phytolith traits were used to distinguish plant origin; e.g.s, awns of paddy rice, reed, bamboo subfamily, barnyard grass, separately counted in same field of glass sand, with separate calculation for l g dry soil sample for each type and phytolith quantity (N) [p.89]
N=a x GW/SW x Np/NG
type: a=l g glass sand; e.g., this research uses 300,000 heavy 0.0256 g purified glass sand, therefore a = l/0.0256 x 3 x 105
GW = glass sand wt. (g)
SW = soil sample wt. (g)
NP = phytolith number
NG = glass sand number
In 1 g soil sample, the phytolith quantity N and each phytolith coefficient (corresponding to phytolith surface and plant dry wt./seed-wt.) is used to calculate the unit volume of soil for plant productivity. As this study uses phytoliths from a surface area of 1 m2 of 1 cm thick soil, kg/m2 x cm is equivalent to plant productivity. Here, the concept 'plant productivity' differs from normal annual plant productivity in being used only as comparative indices between different levels and their phytolith contents. Furthermore, the phytolith coefficient varies according to plant type and its cultivation. This study employs the 1995 coefficient obtained from 28 regional specimens in normal planted condition (8).
|
Specimen |
number |
level |
time |
C14 age (BP) |
Adj. age (BP) |
|
Soil (3) |
1 2 3 |
T3-3 T3-5 T3-8 |
Majiabang Majiabang Majiabang |
5590±120 7260±60 |
6245±170 8060±60 |
|
Red oxidized soil (5) |
1 2 3 4 5 |
T3-3 T3-3 t3-4 t3-5 t3-6 |
Majiabang Majiabang Majiabang Majiabang Majiabang |
5590±120 |
6245±170 |
|
sherds |
1 |
t3-2 |
Sonze |
||
|
(23) |
2 |
t3-4 |
Majiabang |
||
|
3 |
t3-4t |
Majiabang |
|||
|
4 |
t3-4 |
Majiabang |
|||
|
5 |
t3-4 |
Majiabang |
|||
|
6 |
t3-5 |
Majiabang |
5590±120 |
6245±170 |
|
|
7 |
t3-5 |
Majiabang |
5590±120 |
6245±170 |
|
|
8 |
t3-5 |
Majiabang |
5590±120 |
6245±170 |
|
|
9 |
t3-6 |
Majiabang |
|||
|
10 |
t3-6 |
Majiabang |
|||
|
11 |
t3-7 |
Majiabang |
6060±130 |
6715±77 |
|
|
12 |
T4-2 |
plowzone |
|||
|
13 |
T4-5 |
Majiabang |
|||
|
14 |
T4-5 |
Majiabang |
|||
|
15 |
T4-6 |
Majiabang |
|||
|
16 |
T4-6 |
Majiabang |
|||
|
17 |
T4-7 |
Majiabang |
|||
|
18 |
T4-7 |
Majiabang |
|||
|
19 |
T4-7 |
Majiabang |
|||
|
20 |
T4-8 |
Majiabang |
|||
|
21 |
T4-8 |
Majiabang |
|||
|
22 |
T4-8 |
Majiabang |
|||
|
23 |
T4-8 |
Majiabang |
Table 2. E Dongshan Village sites phytolith analysis data sheet
(2) sherd analysis
Red oxidized soil and 23 sherds were analyzed (17) according to Hiroshi Fujiwara's method to withdraw 5 phytoliths. Take a suitable size sherd, clean with ultrasound, then remove moisture under vacuum. Use slight mechanical power to powder specimens, followed by ultrasound to precipitate <10μm granules and other impurities, and finally observing using SEM.
(3) shape analysis
Cailin Wang et al.'s phytolith shape determination method (3)(6) was used on specimens, Table 2, a schematic of paddy rice leaf blade phytoliths. 50 rice phytoliths were stochastically chosen for each specimen, magnified x400 to determine length, width, thickness & b length. A,b separately expresses phytolith arc height and handle length, their ratios forming coefficient b/a. Each specimen had 3 determinations (total=150), the mean value expressing the phytolith trait value, and following each value according to 97 Asian paddy rice phytolith principal components analysis on indica-japonica differentiation (2).
Z4 = 0.497VL - 0.2994HL + 0.1357LL - 3.8154b/a - 8.9567
(Z4 < 0 for indica; Z4 >= 0 for japonica)
VL, HL, LL and b/a are phytolith length, width, thickness and shape coefficient. Distinction results show ancient rice was distinguished by indica-japonica type.
1. 3 soil samples from T3 levels 3, 5 & 8 were examined for phytoliths (Photos 1-3). Table l of C14 measurements shows E Dongshan Village sites had rice for at least 8000 years.
Table 3 shows quantitative phytolith results in each soil layer. Generally, 1 g soil has >5000 rice phytoliths, with level 3 approaching 80,000 and levels 5 & 8 >200,000. Converting to rice output, level 3 dried soil weight is 37 with 11 kg/m2 - cm; levels 5 & 8 is 97-101 with 28-29 kg/m2 - cm, showing paddy rice growth possibility is enormous in these soil layers.
|
soil level |
l g soil paddy rice phytolith quantity |
converted paddy rice output (kg/m2 - cm) |
|
|
dried soil wt. |
paddy rice wt. |
||
|
3 |
79371 |
37 |
11 |
|
5 |
218298 |
101 |
29 |
|
8 |
208249 |
97 |
28 |
|
soil level |
dried plant matter (kg/m2 - cm) |
|||
|
reed |
bamboo-like |
sandalgrass-like |
barnyard grass |
|
|
3 |
0.95 |
0.13 |
0.51 |
0.00 |
|
5 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.55 |
0.00 |
|
8 |
0.00 |
0.07 |
0.51 |
0.00 |
Table 4 shows other phytolith results. No barnyard grass phytoliths occur. Level 3 has mainly reed, then sandalgrass and bamboo phytoliths. Level 8 has few bamboo phytoliths. Level 3 has more bamboo and reed phytoliths.
Table 5 shows analystical results of red oxidized soil and sherd phytoliths. Sample 2 soil has abundant paddy rice phytoliths but little of reed, bamboo, sandalgrass and barnyard grass. No phytoliths occur in the 4 other red oxidized soil samples. Sherd samples 7 & 18 have abundant paddy rice phytoliths. T3 3rd l paddy rice sample has many phytoliths (Photo 4). Converting, heavy rough rice output reaches 25 and 7 kg/m2 - cm, while barnyard grass phytoliths expand, converting to 15 kg/m2 - cm.
|
Sample type |
Sample no. |
plant type |
||||
|
paddy rice |
reed |
bamboo- like |
sandalgrass- like |
barnyard grass |
||
|
red oxidized soil(5) |
1 2 3 4 5 |
- * - - - |
- O - - - |
- O - - - |
- O - - - |
- O - - - |
|
Sherds (23) |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 |
- - - - - O * O O O O O O O - - O * O - O - - |
O - - - - - - O - - - - O O - - - O - - - O - |
- - - - - - - O - - - - O O - - - - - - - - - |
O O O O O O - O O - - - O - - O - O - - O - - |
- O - - - - - O - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
Table 5: Phytolith analysis results in red oxidized soil & potsherds, E Dongshan Villages sites. Note: "O" with "-" separate denotes plant with few phytoliths; * denotes plants with abundant phytoliths.[p.92]
Of 23 sherds, 13 have paddy rice phytoliths, 2 with very many in T5 5th (#7) and T4 7th (#18) (Photos 5-6), plus 12 with sandalgrass phytoliths. But reed, bamboo as well as barnyard grass phytoliths are in specimen 5. Overall, other phytolith contents are small.
Phytolith length, width, thickness and shape coefficient were measured in 3 soil samples, 1 red oxidized soil and 2 sherds to determine indica-japonica differentiation, obtaining distinction values between l.15-3.62 (Table 6). Phytolith shape shows E Dongshan Village site japonica began 8000 years ago.
Measurements were repeated in comparing East Dongshan Village and Caoxieshan sites with 26 japonica and 26 indica phytoliths. The 4 E Dongshan Village sites phytolith traits are all obviously bigger than japonica, their difference reaching 1% levels (Table 7) and much bigger than indica. The 4 E Dongshan Village sites phytolith traits exceed Majiabang period Caoxieshan, reaching 1% levels besides differet thicknesses; other trait differences are unremarkable (Table 7).
|
sample |
length (μm) |
width (μm) |
thick(μm) |
shape coeff. |
(Z4)* results |
result |
|
T3 3rd |
45.38 |
35.80 |
32.78 |
0.94 |
3.62 |
japonica |
|
T3 5th |
45.21 |
35.73 |
29.28 |
1.02 |
2.79 |
japonica |
|
T3 8th |
44.30 |
35.22 |
32.66 |
0.98 |
3.11 |
japonica |
|
oxidiz.2 |
42.31 |
34.41 |
29.69 |
0.96 |
2.05 |
japonica |
|
sherd 7 |
39.42 |
31.23 |
29.76 |
0.94 |
1.66 |
japonica |
|
sherd 18 |
39.43 |
32.57 |
32.20 |
1.05 |
1.15 |
japonica |
|
Comparison |
length (μm) |
width (μm) |
thick (μm) |
shape coefficient |
distinction value |
|
Dongshan Village |
42.68A |
34.16A |
31.06A |
0.98A |
2.40 |
|
Caoxieshan |
41.54A |
32.93A |
29.42B |
0.95A |
2.11 |
|
indica rice |
35.37C |
31.98B |
24.51D |
0.97A |
-1.14 |
|
japonica rice |
37.55B |
33.19A |
27.29C |
0.81B |
0.30 |
Table 6 shows paddy rice phytoliths in oxidized soil differ from those in sherds. Paddy soil phytolith length and width is obviously larger than red oxidized soil phytoliths, which exceed sherd phytoliths (see Table 3). [p.93] Distinction values are also higher in soil sample than red oxidized soil, which exceed those in sherds (Table 4).
Rice phytoliths quantified in T3 levels 3, 5 & 8 in l g soil samples number 80-220,000, surpassing standard paddy rice soil. Xiao Jiayi et al. reports highest paddy rice phytoliths in T3 levels 2, 4 & 6, then levels 3, 5, 7 & 8, with few in level 9, while each level in T4 is quite even (14). While Xiao Jiayi et al.'s analysis was non-quantitative, making direct comparison unlikely, there is little room for doubt. Moreover, T3 level 3 red oxidized soil, T3 level 5 and T4 level 7 sherd also show massive paddy rice. Our results are unable to judge soil layers at the time of the ancient rice paddy, perhaps because gathering and paddy rice use left accumulations. Irregardless, one cannot deny the quantity of paddy rice phytoliths in E Dongshan Village sites in the last 8000 years.
Paddy rice phytoliths results show ancient cultivated paddy rice was all japonica, but it differed at Tai Lake, except in Caoxieshan's Majiabang period where japonica was similar. Simultaneously, there were different type phytoliths in the red oxidized soil and sherds.
While E Dongshan Village sites had no paddy rice remains, Majiabang soil, red oxidized soil and sherds show paddy rice phytoliths. This one fact is fully proved in phytolith analysis in Agricultural Archaeology.
In sum, primitive paddy rice cultivation began 8000 years ago in E Dongshan Village, with phytoliths showing japonica. Regarding China paddy rice origin and spread, Tai Lake primitive agriculture has crucial significance.
(1) Cailin Wang, Tetsuo Udatsu, Hiroshi Fujiwara, Akira Sasaki & Tung Linghua: Caoxieshan ancient paddy site study China (2nd report) phytolith analysis. Archaeology and Natural Sciences 1994,30:37-52.
(2) Cailin Wang, Tetsuo Udatsu, Hiroshi Fujiwara & Zheng Yunfei: Principal component analysis and application of subspecies differentiation by rice phytoliths. Archaeology and Natural Sciences 1996,35:53-71.
(3) Cailin Wang, Tetsuo Udatsu, Tung Linghua, Akira Sasaki & Hiroshi Fujiwara: Phytolith analytsis and its archaeological application. Southeast Culture 1997,3:14-22.
(4) Cailin Wang, Tetsuo Udatsu, Hiroshi Fujiwara, Tang Linghua & Zou Jiangshi: Asian interspecies difference in cultivated rice phytolith traits in indica & japonica, Jiangsu Agriculture Journal 1997,13(3):129-138.
(5) Cailin Wang, Tetsuo Udatsu, Hiroshi Fujiwara, Yo-Ichiro Sato, Tung Linghua & Zou Jiangshi: Principal components analysis of cultivated rice phytolith traits. Jiangsu Agriculture Journal 1998,14(1):1-8.
(6) Cailin Wang & Zhang Min: Primitive paddy rice in Gaoyoulong Village sites. Agricultural Archaeology 1998, 1(49):172-181.
(7) Tetsuo Udatsu, Cailin Wang, Kazuo Yanagisawa, Akira Sasaki, Zou Jiangshi, Tung Linghua & Hiroshi Fujiwara: Caoxieshan ancient paddy site investigation (1st report). Archaeology and Natural Sciences 1994,30:23-36.
(8) Tetsuo Udatsu, Zheng Yunfei, Cailin Wang, Yoshifumi Kawajiri & Hiroshi Fujiwara: Density and coefficients of japonica phytoliths in the Chinese temperate zone. Collection of research excerpts. Japanese Cultural Asset Society of Science 1996:64-65, chap.13.
(9) Tung Linghua, Zou Jiangshi, Cailin Wang & Li Hebiao: Ancient rice paddy investigation at Jiangsu's Meinian Longnan sites. Agricultural Archaeology 1992,3:70-73.
(10) Tung Linghua, Zhang Min, Li Minchang, Sun Jiaxiang: Primitive paddy rice in Gaoyou Longqiu Village sites. Crops journal 22 (5):608-612.
(11) Zhang Min, Tung Linghua: Eest Jiangsu and Anhui Province primitive paddy rice agriculture and discussion of correlation question. Agricultural Archaeology 1996,43:106-121.
(12) Chen Baozhang, Zhang Juzhong, Lü Houyuan: Phytolith significance in Henan's Jia lake Neolithic paddy rice. Science circular 1995(40-4):339-342.
(13) Jiang Qinhua: Using phytolith analysis to appraise China's prehistoric paddy rice agriculture. Agricultural Archaeology 1994, 33:85-88.
(14) Xiao Jiayi, Qian Gongling, Ding Jinglong, Zhang Zhaogen. Ancient paddy rice phytoliths in Jiangsu's East Zhangjiagang Dongshan Village sites. Agricultural Archaeology 1994, 35:98-303.
(15) Hiroshi Fujiwara: Fundamental research in phytolith analysis (1) Sampling phytolith in rice and methodology of quantitative analysis. Archaeology and Natural Sciences 1976, 9:15-29.
(16) Hiroshi Fujiwara: Fundamental research in phytolith analysis (3) Estimation of paddy rice productivity (Oryza sativa L.) at Itatsuki site (Fukuoka period) and Hitaka site, Gumma (Yayoi period). Archaeology and Natural Sciences 1982, 14:55-65.
(17) Hiroshi Fujiwara: Fundamental research in phytolith analysis (4) Phytolith detection in soil in Jomon vessels in the Kumamoto region. Archaeology and Natural Sciences 1982, 14:55-65.
(18) Hiroshi Fujiwara: Caoxieshan site primitive paddy field rice, China. Japanese Cultural Asset Society of Science symposium on Search for Rice Origin - Executive committee Search for Ancient Paddy Rice Origin at Caoxieshan site, China 1996:80-81.
(19) Morishima, H. & H.I.Oka: Phylogenetic differentiation of cultivated rice. XXII. Numerical evaluation of indica-japonica differentiation Japan. J.Breed. 1981.31:402-413.
Figs. 1 & 2.
Figs. 3 & 4
Photos 1-6.