1 0 Title Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994. Variables: 104 Number of cases read: 1,000 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 2 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q1 Q1 AGE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 18 To 24 2.00 153 15.3 15.3 15.3 25 To 34 3.00 223 22.3 22.3 37.6 35 To 44 4.00 242 24.2 24.2 61.8 45 To 54 5.00 165 16.5 16.5 78.3 55 To 64 6.00 116 11.6 11.6 89.9 65 And Over 7.00 101 10.1 10.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q2 Q2 MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE FACING QUEBEC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Unemployment/Jobs 1.00 498 49.8 49.8 49.8 Deficit/Debt/Gov't O 2.00 73 7.3 7.3 57.1 The Economy/Recessio 3.00 133 13.3 13.3 70.4 National Unity/Separ 4.00 53 5.3 5.3 75.7 The Environment 5.00 11 1.1 1.1 76.8 Free Trade/NAFTA 6.00 4 .4 .4 77.2 Health Care 7.00 4 .4 .4 77.6 Education/Educationa 8.00 8 .8 .8 78.4 Bilingualism/Languag 9.00 16 1.6 1.6 80.0 Social Problems/Mora 10.00 87 8.7 8.7 88.7 The Upcoming Electio 11.00 4 .4 .4 89.1 Misc Problems With T 12.00 62 6.2 6.2 95.3 Other 88.00 13 1.3 1.3 96.6 Don't Know 99.00 34 3.4 3.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 3 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q3 Q3 HOUSEHOLD INCOME VS. COST OF LIVING Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent More Than Keep Pace 1.00 128 12.8 12.8 12.8 Keep Pace 2.00 397 39.7 39.7 52.5 Fall Behind 3.00 445 44.5 44.5 97.0 Don't Know 4.00 30 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q4 Q4 WORST OF RECESSION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Behind Us 1.00 512 51.2 51.2 51.2 Yet To Come 2.00 391 39.1 39.1 90.3 Don't Know 3.00 97 9.7 9.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q5 Q5 LIKELIHOOD OF JOB LOSS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Very Likely 1.00 125 12.5 12.5 12.5 Somewhat Likely 2.00 227 22.7 22.7 35.2 Somewhat Unlikely 3.00 284 28.4 28.4 63.6 Very Unlikely 4.00 327 32.7 32.7 96.3 Not Sure/Don't Know 5.00 37 3.7 3.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 4 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q6 Q6 PROVINCIAL VOTE INTENT-SOLID Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Parti Quebecois 1.00 364 36.4 36.4 36.4 Quebec Liberal Party 2.00 256 25.6 25.6 62.0 Parti Action Democra 3.00 15 1.5 1.5 63.5 Equality Party 4.00 7 .7 .7 64.2 Other 5.00 23 2.3 2.3 66.5 Undecided 6.00 173 17.3 17.3 83.8 Won't Vote 7.00 48 4.8 4.8 88.6 Don't Know/Refused 8.00 114 11.4 11.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q7 Q7 PROVINCIAL VOTE INTENT-LEANING Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Parti Quebecois 1.00 20 2.0 11.6 11.6 Quebec Liberal Party 2.00 14 1.4 8.1 19.7 Parti Action Democra 3.00 1 .1 .6 20.2 Other 5.00 8 .8 4.6 24.9 Undecided 6.00 88 8.8 50.9 75.7 Don't Know/Refused 8.00 42 4.2 24.3 100.0 . 827 82.7 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 173 Missing cases 827 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 5 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q7A Q7A PROVINCIAL VOTE INTENT-S&L Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Parti Quebecois 1.00 384 38.4 38.4 38.4 Quebec Liberal Party 2.00 270 27.0 27.0 65.4 Parti Action Democra 3.00 16 1.6 1.6 67.0 Equality Party 4.00 7 .7 .7 67.7 Other 5.00 31 3.1 3.1 70.8 Undecided 6.00 88 8.8 8.8 79.6 Won't Vote 7.00 48 4.8 4.8 84.4 Don't Know/Refused 8.00 156 15.6 15.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q7B Q7B PROV VOTE INTENT-POTENTIAL VOTERS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Parti Quebecois 1.00 384 38.4 48.2 48.2 Quebec Liberal Party 2.00 270 27.0 33.9 82.2 Parti Action Democra 3.00 16 1.6 2.0 84.2 Equality Party 4.00 7 .7 .9 85.1 Other 5.00 31 3.1 3.9 88.9 Undecided 6.00 88 8.8 11.1 100.0 . 204 20.4 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 796 Missing cases 204 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 6 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q7C Q7C PROV VOTE INTENT-DECIDED VOTERS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Parti Quebecois 1.00 384 38.4 54.2 54.2 Quebec Liberal Party 2.00 270 27.0 38.1 92.4 Parti Action Democra 3.00 16 1.6 2.3 94.6 Equality Party 4.00 7 .7 1.0 95.6 Other 5.00 31 3.1 4.4 100.0 . 292 29.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 708 Missing cases 292 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q8 Q8 IMPRESSION-DANIEL JOHNSON Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Not at all Impressed 1.00 187 18.7 18.7 18.7 2.00 87 8.7 8.7 27.4 3.00 97 9.7 9.7 37.1 4.00 93 9.3 9.3 46.4 5.00 189 18.9 18.9 65.3 6.00 91 9.1 9.1 74.4 7.00 79 7.9 7.9 82.3 8.00 67 6.7 6.7 89.0 9.00 15 1.5 1.5 90.5 Very Impressed 10.00 23 2.3 2.3 92.8 Don't Know 11.00 72 7.2 7.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 7 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q9 Q9 IMPRESSION-JACQUES PARIZEAU Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Not at all Impressed 1.00 213 21.3 21.3 21.3 2.00 69 6.9 6.9 28.2 3.00 101 10.1 10.1 38.3 4.00 85 8.5 8.5 46.8 5.00 170 17.0 17.0 63.8 6.00 94 9.4 9.4 73.2 7.00 81 8.1 8.1 81.3 8.00 67 6.7 6.7 88.0 9.00 27 2.7 2.7 90.7 Very Impressed 10.00 36 3.6 3.6 94.3 Don't Know 11.00 57 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q9A Q9A IMPRESSION-JACQUES PARIZEAU Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Very Impressed 1.00 63 6.3 6.3 6.3 Somewhat Impressed 2.00 148 14.8 14.8 21.1 Neutral 3.00 264 26.4 26.4 47.5 Not Too Impressed 4.00 186 18.6 18.6 66.1 Not At All Impressed 5.00 282 28.2 28.2 94.3 Don't Know 11.00 57 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 8 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q10 Q10 IMPRESSION-JEAN ALLAIRE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Not at all Impressed 1.00 229 22.9 22.9 22.9 2.00 90 9.0 9.0 31.9 3.00 91 9.1 9.1 41.0 4.00 73 7.3 7.3 48.3 5.00 129 12.9 12.9 61.2 6.00 48 4.8 4.8 66.0 7.00 27 2.7 2.7 68.7 8.00 20 2.0 2.0 70.7 9.00 7 .7 .7 71.4 Very Impressed 10.00 8 .8 .8 72.2 Don't Know 11.00 278 27.8 27.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q10A Q10A IMPRESSION-JEAN ALLAIRE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Very Impressed 1.00 15 1.5 1.5 1.5 Somewhat Impressed 2.00 47 4.7 4.7 6.2 Neutral 3.00 177 17.7 17.7 23.9 Not Too Impressed 4.00 164 16.4 16.4 40.3 Not At All Impressed 5.00 319 31.9 31.9 72.2 Don't Know 11.00 278 27.8 27.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 9 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q11 Q11 IMPRESSION-LUCIEN BOUCHARD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Not at all Impressed 1.00 153 15.3 15.3 15.3 2.00 54 5.4 5.4 20.7 3.00 58 5.8 5.8 26.5 4.00 76 7.6 7.6 34.1 5.00 144 14.4 14.4 48.5 6.00 86 8.6 8.6 57.1 7.00 92 9.2 9.2 66.3 8.00 141 14.1 14.1 80.4 9.00 55 5.5 5.5 85.9 Very Impressed 10.00 59 5.9 5.9 91.8 Don't Know 11.00 82 8.2 8.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q11A Q11A IMPRESSION-LUCIEN BOUCHARD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Very Impressed 1.00 114 11.4 11.4 11.4 Somewhat Impressed 2.00 233 23.3 23.3 34.7 Neutral 3.00 230 23.0 23.0 57.7 Not Too Impressed 4.00 134 13.4 13.4 71.1 Not At All Impressed 5.00 207 20.7 20.7 91.8 Don't Know 11.00 82 8.2 8.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 10 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q12 Q12 IMPRESSION-JEAN CHRETIEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Not at all Impressed 1.00 255 25.5 25.5 25.5 2.00 95 9.5 9.5 35.0 3.00 67 6.7 6.7 41.7 4.00 94 9.4 9.4 51.1 5.00 146 14.6 14.6 65.7 6.00 82 8.2 8.2 73.9 7.00 75 7.5 7.5 81.4 8.00 72 7.2 7.2 88.6 9.00 22 2.2 2.2 90.8 Very Impressed 10.00 41 4.1 4.1 94.9 Don't Know 11.00 51 5.1 5.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q12A Q12A IMPRESSION-JEAN CHRETIEN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Very Impressed 1.00 63 6.3 6.3 6.3 Somewhat Impressed 2.00 147 14.7 14.7 21.0 Neutral 3.00 228 22.8 22.8 43.8 Not Too Impressed 4.00 161 16.1 16.1 59.9 Not At All Impressed 5.00 350 35.0 35.0 94.9 Don't Know 11.00 51 5.1 5.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 11 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q13 Q13 PARTY TO WIN THE NEXT QUEBEC ELECTN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Parti Quebecois 1.00 481 48.1 48.1 48.1 Quebec Liberal Party 2.00 300 30.0 30.0 78.1 Parti Action Democra 3.00 2 .2 .2 78.3 Other 4.00 16 1.6 1.6 79.9 Don't Know/Refused 5.00 201 20.1 20.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q14 Q14 FACTORS DETERMINING VOTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Party Policies 1.00 531 53.1 53.1 53.1 The Party Leader 2.00 187 18.7 18.7 71.8 The Local Candidate 3.00 195 19.5 19.5 91.3 Other 4.00 33 3.3 3.3 94.6 Not Sure/Don't Know 5.00 54 5.4 5.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q15 Q15 ATTITUDE TOWARD THE INDEPENDENCE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Favour 1.00 449 44.9 44.9 44.9 Oppose 2.00 422 42.2 42.2 87.1 Don't Know 3.00 54 5.4 5.4 92.5 No Opinion 4.00 75 7.5 7.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 12 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q16S Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Better For Quebec's 1.00 35 3.5 7.8 7.8 Lower Taxes 2.00 16 1.6 3.6 11.4 We'll Become A Natio 3.00 42 4.2 9.4 20.7 Cntrl Que Autonomy/R 4.00 60 6.0 13.4 34.1 Can Manage By Oursel 5.00 17 1.7 3.8 37.9 Econ Cost/Taxes/Payi 6.00 26 2.6 5.8 43.7 Not Paying For Two G 7.00 2 .2 .4 44.1 Federal Mismanagemen 8.00 5 .5 1.1 45.2 Federalism Not Worki 9.00 32 3.2 7.1 52.3 Eliminate Duplicatns 10.00 10 1.0 2.2 54.6 Quebec Is Different/ 11.00 8 .8 1.8 56.3 We Have Nothg To Los 12.00 18 1.8 4.0 60.4 To Sort Out Problems 13.00 45 4.5 10.0 70.4 We Need A Change/A F 14.00 15 1.5 3.3 73.7 To Get Our Dignity B 15.00 6 .6 1.3 75.1 The Only Option/Part 16.00 11 1.1 2.4 77.5 To Create Jobs 17.00 11 1.1 2.4 80.0 To Protect The Frenc 18.00 30 3.0 6.7 86.6 I'm A Quebecer 19.00 3 .3 .7 87.3 It Depends..._ 20.00 3 .3 .7 88.0 Other 88.00 12 1.2 2.7 90.6 Don't Know 99.00 42 4.2 9.4 100.0 . 551 55.1 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 449 Missing cases 551 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 13 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q16T Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Better For Quebec's 1.00 31 3.1 6.9 6.9 Lower Taxes 2.00 4 .4 .9 7.8 We'll Become A Natio 3.00 11 1.1 2.5 10.3 Cntrl Que Autonomy/R 4.00 31 3.1 6.9 17.2 Can Manage By Oursel 5.00 10 1.0 2.2 19.4 Econ Cost/Taxes/Payi 6.00 13 1.3 2.9 22.3 Not Paying For Two G 7.00 2 .2 .4 22.8 Federal Mismanagemen 8.00 2 .2 .4 23.2 Federalism Not Worki 9.00 17 1.7 3.8 27.0 Eliminate Duplicatns 10.00 7 .7 1.6 28.6 Quebec Is Different/ 11.00 6 .6 1.3 29.9 We Have Nothg To Los 12.00 1 .1 .2 30.1 To Sort Out Problems 13.00 6 .6 1.3 31.5 We Need A Change/A F 14.00 5 .5 1.1 32.6 To Get Our Dignity B 15.00 4 .4 .9 33.5 The Only Option/Part 16.00 2 .2 .4 33.9 To Create Jobs 17.00 7 .7 1.6 35.5 To Protect The Frenc 18.00 27 2.7 6.0 41.5 I'm A Quebecer 19.00 1 .1 .2 41.7 It Depends..._ 20.00 1 .1 .2 42.0 Other 88.00 9 .9 2.0 44.0 Don't Know 99.00 251 25.1 56.0 100.0 . 552 55.2 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 448 Missing cases 552 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 14 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q16X Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Not Econ'ly Feasible 1.00 78 7.8 18.5 18.5 Deficit Must Be Paid 2.00 4 .4 .9 19.4 Believe In United Ca 3.00 113 11.3 26.8 46.2 Not A Good Decision/ 4.00 90 9.0 21.3 67.5 More Confidence In C 5.00 1 .1 .2 67.8 Quebec Will Not Surv 6.00 42 4.2 10.0 77.7 Quebec Is Not Ready/ 7.00 12 1.2 2.8 80.6 Difficult For Anglop 8.00 8 .8 1.9 82.5 Don't Believe Separa 9.00 6 .6 1.4 83.9 Will Provoke A Civil 10.00 2 .2 .5 84.4 All Provinces Are Eq 11.00 1 .1 .2 84.6 Relatns Betwn Quebec 12.00 3 .3 .7 85.3 Other 88.00 14 1.4 3.3 88.6 Don't Know 99.00 48 4.8 11.4 100.0 . 578 57.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 422 Missing cases 578 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 15 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q16Y Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Not Econ'ly Feasible 1.00 34 3.4 8.1 8.1 Deficit Must Be Paid 2.00 2 .2 .5 8.5 Believe In United Ca 3.00 32 3.2 7.6 16.1 Not A Good Decision/ 4.00 18 1.8 4.3 20.4 More Confidence In C 5.00 1 .1 .2 20.6 Quebec Will Not Surv 6.00 16 1.6 3.8 24.4 Quebec Is Not Ready/ 7.00 4 .4 .9 25.4 Difficult For Anglop 8.00 8 .8 1.9 27.3 Don't Believe Separa 9.00 5 .5 1.2 28.4 Will Provoke A Civil 10.00 2 .2 .5 28.9 All Provinces Are Eq 11.00 1 .1 .2 29.1 Relatns Betwn Quebec 12.00 6 .6 1.4 30.6 Other 88.00 7 .7 1.7 32.2 Don't Know 99.00 286 28.6 67.8 100.0 . 578 57.8 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 422 Missing cases 578 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q17 Q17 VIEW-QUEBEC'S SHARE OF FED SPENDING Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent More 1.00 103 10.3 10.3 10.3 Fair Share 2.00 392 39.2 39.2 49.5 Less 3.00 385 38.5 38.5 88.0 Not Sure/Don't Know 4.00 120 12.0 12.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 16 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q18 Q18 PERCEIVED SUPPORT OF INDEPENDT QUEB Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Support 1.00 36 3.6 3.6 3.6 Somewhat Support 2.00 127 12.7 12.7 16.3 Somewhat Oppose 3.00 341 34.1 34.1 50.4 Strongly Oppose 4.00 386 38.6 38.6 89.0 Don't Know 5.00 81 8.1 8.1 97.1 No Opinion 6.00 29 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q19 Q19 STATEMEMT-INDEP TO PROTECT CULTURE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 290 29.0 29.0 29.0 Somewhat Agree 2.00 238 23.8 23.8 52.8 Somewhat Disagree 3.00 209 20.9 20.9 73.7 Strongly Disagree 4.00 241 24.1 24.1 97.8 Not Sure/Don't Know 5.00 22 2.2 2.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 17 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q20 Q20 STATEMEMT-INDEP MEANS LESS SERVICE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 173 17.3 17.3 17.3 Somewhat Agree 2.00 228 22.8 22.8 40.1 Somewhat Disagree 3.00 271 27.1 27.1 67.2 Strongly Disagree 4.00 281 28.1 28.1 95.3 Not Sure/Don't Know 5.00 47 4.7 4.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q21 Q21 STATEMEMT- 2-LEVEL GOV'T IS A WASTE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 410 41.0 41.0 41.0 Somewhat Agree 2.00 260 26.0 26.0 67.0 Somewhat Disagree 3.00 160 16.0 16.0 83.0 Strongly Disagree 4.00 134 13.4 13.4 96.4 Not Sure/Don't Know 5.00 36 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q22 Q22 STATEMEMT-QUEB IN CANADA COMPETITV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 291 29.1 29.1 29.1 Somewhat Agree 2.00 307 30.7 30.7 59.8 Somewhat Disagree 3.00 229 22.9 22.9 82.7 Strongly Disagree 4.00 116 11.6 11.6 94.3 Not Sure/Don't Know 5.00 57 5.7 5.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 18 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q23 Q23 LIKELIHD-QUEBEC IS INDEP IN 3 YEARS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Very Likely 1.00 133 13.3 13.3 13.3 Somewhat Likely 2.00 301 30.1 30.1 43.4 Somewhat Unlikely 3.00 310 31.0 31.0 74.4 Very Unlikely 4.00 220 22.0 22.0 96.4 Not Sure/Don't Know 5.00 36 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q24 Q24 INTENTN TO LIVE IN INDEPENDT QUEBEC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent More Likely 1.00 826 82.6 82.6 82.6 Less Unlikely 2.00 130 13.0 13.0 95.6 Not Sure/Don't Know 3.00 44 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q25 Q25 IMPORTANCE-SPEAK A SECOND LANGUAGE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Very Important 1.00 538 53.8 53.8 53.8 Somewhat Important 2.00 312 31.2 31.2 85.0 Not Very Important 3.00 96 9.6 9.6 94.6 Not At All Important 4.00 42 4.2 4.2 98.8 Not Sure/Don't Know 5.00 12 1.2 1.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 19 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q26 Q26 PRIORITY FOR THE QUEBEC GOVERNMENT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Job Creation 1.00 735 73.5 73.5 73.5 Deficit Reduction 2.00 212 21.2 21.2 94.7 Don't Know 3.00 32 3.2 3.2 97.9 No Opinion 4.00 21 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q27 Q27 GOV'T SPENDING-MANPOWER TRAINING Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Spend More 1.00 642 64.2 64.2 64.2 Spend Same 2.00 242 24.2 24.2 88.4 Spend Less 3.00 92 9.2 9.2 97.6 Don't Know/Refused 4.00 24 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q28 Q28 GOV'T SPENDING-ENVIRONMNTL PROTECTN Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Spend More 1.00 405 40.5 40.5 40.5 Spend Same 2.00 416 41.6 41.6 82.1 Spend Less 3.00 165 16.5 16.5 98.6 Don't Know/Refused 4.00 14 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 20 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q29 Q29 GOV'T SPENDING-RESEARCH/DEVELOPMENT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Spend More 1.00 462 46.2 46.2 46.2 Spend Same 2.00 367 36.7 36.7 82.9 Spend Less 3.00 144 14.4 14.4 97.3 Don't Know/Refused 4.00 27 2.7 2.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q30 Q30 GOV'T SPENDING-SOCIAL ASSISTANCE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Spend More 1.00 155 15.5 15.5 15.5 Spend Same 2.00 332 33.2 33.2 48.7 Spend Less 3.00 490 49.0 49.0 97.7 Don't Know/Refused 4.00 23 2.3 2.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q31 Q31 GOV'T SPENDING-SUPPORT SMALL BUS._ Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Spend More 1.00 509 50.9 50.9 50.9 Spend Same 2.00 329 32.9 32.9 83.8 Spend Less 3.00 148 14.8 14.8 98.6 Don't Know/Refused 4.00 14 1.4 1.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 21 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q32 Q32 GOV'T SPENDING-MULTICULTURALISM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Spend More 1.00 161 16.1 16.1 16.1 Spend Same 2.00 406 40.6 40.6 56.7 Spend Less 3.00 387 38.7 38.7 95.4 Don't Know/Refused 4.00 46 4.6 4.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q33 Q33 GOV'T SPENDING-FRENCH LANGUAGE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Spend More 1.00 320 32.0 32.0 32.0 Spend Same 2.00 457 45.7 45.7 77.7 Spend Less 3.00 210 21.0 21.0 98.7 Don't Know/Refused 4.00 13 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q34 Q34 GOV'T SPENDING-HEALTH CARE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Spend More 1.00 427 42.7 42.7 42.7 Spend Same 2.00 456 45.6 45.6 88.3 Spend Less 3.00 110 11.0 11.0 99.3 Don't Know/Refused 4.00 7 .7 .7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 22 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q35 Q35 GOV'T SPENDING-EDUCATION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Spend More 1.00 560 56.0 56.0 56.0 Spend Same 2.00 389 38.9 38.9 94.9 Spend Less 3.00 42 4.2 4.2 99.1 Don't Know/Refused 4.00 9 .9 .9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q36 Q36 EFFECTIVE-INVEST IN HI-TECH FIRMS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Least Effective 1.00 62 6.2 6.2 6.2 2 2.00 98 9.8 9.8 16.0 3 3.00 303 30.3 30.3 46.3 4 4.00 193 19.3 19.3 65.6 5 - Most Effective 5.00 312 31.2 31.2 96.8 Don't Know 6.00 32 3.2 3.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 23 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q37 Q37 EFFECTIVE-FOCUS ON BIG PROJECTS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Least Effective 1.00 85 8.5 8.5 8.5 2 2.00 196 19.6 19.6 28.1 3 3.00 340 34.0 34.0 62.1 4 4.00 169 16.9 16.9 79.0 5 - Most Effective 5.00 186 18.6 18.6 97.6 Don't Know 6.00 24 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q38 Q38 EFFECTIVE-SUPPORT SMALL BUSINESSES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Least Effective 1.00 46 4.6 4.6 4.6 2 2.00 87 8.7 8.7 13.3 3 3.00 215 21.5 21.5 34.8 4 4.00 281 28.1 28.1 62.9 5 - Most Effective 5.00 360 36.0 36.0 98.9 Don't Know 6.00 11 1.1 1.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 24 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q39 Q39 EFFECTIVE-STAY OUT OF MARKETPLACE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Least Effective 1.00 137 13.7 13.7 13.7 2 2.00 172 17.2 17.2 30.9 3 3.00 353 35.3 35.3 66.2 4 4.00 103 10.3 10.3 76.5 5 - Most Effective 5.00 110 11.0 11.0 87.5 Don't Know 6.00 125 12.5 12.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q40 Q40 EFFECTIVE-IMPRVE QUEB COMPETITVNESS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Least Effective 1.00 47 4.7 4.7 4.7 2 2.00 52 5.2 5.2 9.9 3 3.00 164 16.4 16.4 26.3 4 4.00 297 29.7 29.7 56.0 5 - Most Effective 5.00 409 40.9 40.9 96.9 Don't Know 6.00 31 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 25 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q41 Q41 EFFECTIVE-REMOVE TRADE BARRIERS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Least Effective 1.00 92 9.2 9.2 9.2 2 2.00 70 7.0 7.0 16.2 3 3.00 206 20.6 20.6 36.8 4 4.00 191 19.1 19.1 55.9 5 - Most Effective 5.00 383 38.3 38.3 94.2 Don't Know 6.00 58 5.8 5.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q42 Q42 EFFECTIVE-REDUCE THE FED DEFICIT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Least Effective 1.00 66 6.6 6.6 6.6 2 2.00 69 6.9 6.9 13.5 3 3.00 185 18.5 18.5 32.0 4 4.00 185 18.5 18.5 50.5 5 - Most Effective 5.00 478 47.8 47.8 98.3 Don't Know 6.00 17 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 26 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q43 Q43 EFFECTIVE-MORE IMMIGRANT INVESTORS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Least Effective 1.00 126 12.6 12.6 12.6 2 2.00 131 13.1 13.1 25.7 3 3.00 311 31.1 31.1 56.8 4 4.00 198 19.8 19.8 76.6 5 - Most Effective 5.00 213 21.3 21.3 97.9 Don't Know 6.00 21 2.1 2.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q44 Q44 EFFECTIVE-CREATE A YOUTH SERV CORPS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Least Effective 1.00 105 10.5 10.5 10.5 2 2.00 136 13.6 13.6 24.1 3 3.00 273 27.3 27.3 51.4 4 4.00 190 19.0 19.0 70.4 5 - Most Effective 5.00 209 20.9 20.9 91.3 Don't Know 6.00 87 8.7 8.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 27 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q45 Q45 ARMED FORCES REPRESENT CULTR OF QUE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 135 13.5 13.5 13.5 Somewhat Agree 2.00 302 30.2 30.2 43.7 Somewhat Disagree 3.00 272 27.2 27.2 70.9 Strongly Disagree 4.00 237 23.7 23.7 94.6 Not Sure/Don't Know 5.00 54 5.4 5.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q46 Q46 ARMED FORCES' ECONOMIC CONTRIBUTION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Very Important 1.00 128 12.8 12.8 12.8 Somewhat Important 2.00 374 37.4 37.4 50.2 Not Very Important 3.00 342 34.2 34.2 84.4 Not At All Important 4.00 130 13.0 13.0 97.4 Not Sure/Don't Know 5.00 26 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q47 Q47 LEVEL OF DEFENCE SPENDING IN CANADA Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Too High 1.00 532 53.2 53.2 53.2 Just Right 2.00 366 36.6 36.6 89.8 Too Low 3.00 66 6.6 6.6 96.4 Not Sure/Don't Know 4.00 36 3.6 3.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 28 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q48 Q48 HI-TECH INVESTMNT CAPITAL IN QUEBEC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Enough Inside Quebec 1.00 309 30.9 30.9 30.9 Outside Investment I 2.00 609 60.9 60.9 91.8 Don't Know 3.00 56 5.6 5.6 97.4 No Opinion 4.00 26 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q49 Q49 PREFERRED SOURCE OF HITECH INVESTMT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Canada 1.00 345 34.5 34.5 34.5 United States 2.00 225 22.5 22.5 57.0 Europe 3.00 194 19.4 19.4 76.4 Asian 4.00 95 9.5 9.5 85.9 Other 5.00 74 7.4 7.4 93.3 Refused 6.00 67 6.7 6.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 29 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q50 Q50 ATTITUDE TOWARD DEVELOPMENT OF TGV Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Support 1.00 392 39.2 39.2 39.2 Somewhat Support 2.00 334 33.4 33.4 72.6 Somewhat Oppose 3.00 122 12.2 12.2 84.8 Strongly Oppose 4.00 105 10.5 10.5 95.3 Don't Know 5.00 22 2.2 2.2 97.5 No Opinion 6.00 25 2.5 2.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q51 Q51 PREFERRED FUNDING METHOD Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Private Funding 1.00 382 38.2 38.2 38.2 Federal Funding Only 2.00 38 3.8 3.8 42.0 Provincial Funding O 3.00 86 8.6 8.6 50.6 Federal And Provinci 4.00 435 43.5 43.5 94.1 Don't Know 5.00 35 3.5 3.5 97.6 No Opinion 6.00 24 2.4 2.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 30 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q52 Q52 PREFERENCE-HYDRO VS. OTHER SOURCE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Hydro 1.00 553 55.3 55.3 55.3 Alternate Sources 2.00 401 40.1 40.1 95.4 Don't Know 3.00 29 2.9 2.9 98.3 No Opinion 4.00 17 1.7 1.7 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q53 Q53 PREFERRED FORM-ELECTRICITY SOURCES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Coal 1.00 3 .3 .7 .7 Wind Power 2.00 116 11.6 28.9 29.7 Solar Power 3.00 158 15.8 39.4 69.1 Nuclear Power 4.00 31 3.1 7.7 76.8 Natural Gas 5.00 78 7.8 19.5 96.3 Other 88.00 6 .6 1.5 97.8 Don't Know/Refused 99.00 9 .9 2.2 100.0 . 599 59.9 Missing ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 401 Missing cases 599 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 31 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q54 Q54 PAY MORE FOR ENV FRIENDLY SOURCES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Yes 1.00 482 48.2 48.2 48.2 No 2.00 470 47.0 47.0 95.2 Don't Know 3.00 35 3.5 3.5 98.7 No Opinion 4.00 13 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q55 Q55 ATTITUDE TO THE ABORIGNL SELF-GOV'T Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Support 1.00 186 18.6 18.6 18.6 Somewhat Support 2.00 293 29.3 29.3 47.9 Somewhat Oppose 3.00 195 19.5 19.5 67.4 Strongly Oppose 4.00 255 25.5 25.5 92.9 Don't Know 5.00 38 3.8 3.8 96.7 No Opinion 6.00 33 3.3 3.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q56 Q56 ATTITUDE TO ABORIGINAL POLICING Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Support 1.00 245 24.5 24.5 24.5 Somewhat Support 2.00 324 32.4 32.4 56.9 Somewhat Oppose 3.00 138 13.8 13.8 70.7 Strongly Oppose 4.00 262 26.2 26.2 96.9 Don't Know/Refused 5.00 31 3.1 3.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 32 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q57 Q57 ATTITUDE TO THE RIGHT TO LEVY TAXES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Support 1.00 287 28.7 28.7 28.7 Somewhat Support 2.00 315 31.5 31.5 60.2 Somewhat Oppose 3.00 128 12.8 12.8 73.0 Strongly Oppose 4.00 220 22.0 22.0 95.0 Don't Know/Refused 5.00 50 5.0 5.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q58 Q58 ATTITUDE TO CTRL OVER RENEWABLES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Support 1.00 284 28.4 28.4 28.4 Somewhat Support 2.00 396 39.6 39.6 68.0 Somewhat Oppose 3.00 130 13.0 13.0 81.0 Strongly Oppose 4.00 155 15.5 15.5 96.5 Don't Know/Refused 5.00 35 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q59 Q59 ATTITUDE TO CTRL OVER NON-RENEWABLE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Support 1.00 162 16.2 16.2 16.2 Somewhat Support 2.00 310 31.0 31.0 47.2 Somewhat Oppose 3.00 228 22.8 22.8 70.0 Strongly Oppose 4.00 248 24.8 24.8 94.8 Don't Know/Refused 5.00 52 5.2 5.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 33 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q60 Q60 ATTITUDE TO ABORIGNL JUSTICE SYSTEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Support 1.00 198 19.8 19.8 19.8 Somewhat Support 2.00 279 27.9 27.9 47.7 Somewhat Oppose 3.00 184 18.4 18.4 66.1 Strongly Oppose 4.00 298 29.8 29.8 95.9 Don't Know/Refused 5.00 41 4.1 4.1 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q61 Q61 MORE/LESS IMMIGRANTS INTO QUEBEC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Increase 1.00 201 20.1 20.1 20.1 Remain The Same 2.00 524 52.4 52.4 72.5 Decrease 3.00 245 24.5 24.5 97.0 Don't Know 4.00 30 3.0 3.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 34 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q62 Q62 CHARACTERISTIC OF A NEW IMMIGRANT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Good Educatn/Good Ac 1.00 71 7.1 7.1 7.1 Having A Professn Or 2.00 64 6.4 6.4 13.5 Hardworking/Motivate 3.00 64 6.4 6.4 19.9 Has Money/Ability To 4.00 47 4.7 4.7 24.6 Ability To Take Care 5.00 43 4.3 4.3 28.9 Ability To Contribut 6.00 13 1.3 1.3 30.2 Honesty/Persnl Qualt 7.00 60 6.0 6.0 36.2 Accepting/Adapting T 8.00 169 16.9 16.9 53.1 Bringing In A New Cu 9.00 4 .4 .4 53.5 Ability To Speak/Lea 10.00 253 25.3 25.3 78.8 Be Bilingual/Learn E 11.00 29 2.9 2.9 81.7 To Have Francophone 12.00 9 .9 .9 82.6 Being Healthy/Good H 13.00 4 .4 .4 83.0 To Work/Remain In Qu 14.00 2 .2 .2 83.2 We Should Accept Ref 15.00 4 .4 .4 83.6 No Refugees 16.00 2 .2 .2 83.8 We Shouldn't Let Any 17.00 6 .6 .6 84.4 Other 88.00 23 2.3 2.3 86.7 Don't Know 99.00 133 13.3 13.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q63 Q63 STATEMENT-IMMIGRANTS TAKE JOBS AWAY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 97 9.7 9.7 9.7 Somewhat Agree 2.00 125 12.5 12.5 22.2 Somewhat Disagree 3.00 346 34.6 34.6 56.8 Strongly Disagree 4.00 406 40.6 40.6 97.4 Not Sure/Don't Know 5.00 26 2.6 2.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 35 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q64 Q64 STATEMENT-IMMIGRANTS'RE CONTRIBUTRS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 285 28.5 28.5 28.5 Somewhat Agree 2.00 440 44.0 44.0 72.5 Somewhat Disagree 3.00 151 15.1 15.1 87.6 Strongly Disagree 4.00 76 7.6 7.6 95.2 Not Sure/Don't Know 5.00 48 4.8 4.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q65 Q65 STATEMENT-IMMIGRATN CAUSES TENSIONS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 139 13.9 13.9 13.9 Somewhat Agree 2.00 242 24.2 24.2 38.1 Somewhat Disagree 3.00 337 33.7 33.7 71.8 Strongly Disagree 4.00 247 24.7 24.7 96.5 Not Sure/Don't Know 5.00 35 3.5 3.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q66 Q66 STATEMT-IMMGRNTS ADD CULTRL STRNGTH Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 289 28.9 28.9 28.9 Somewhat Agree 2.00 414 41.4 41.4 70.3 Somewhat Disagree 3.00 175 17.5 17.5 87.8 Strongly Disagree 4.00 94 9.4 9.4 97.2 Not Sure/Don't Know 5.00 28 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 36 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q67 Q67 IMPORTANCE-HAVE A NEEDED SKILL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Very Important 1.00 659 65.9 65.9 65.9 2 2.00 143 14.3 14.3 80.2 3 3.00 103 10.3 10.3 90.5 4 4.00 38 3.8 3.8 94.3 5 - Not At All Impor 5.00 52 5.2 5.2 99.5 Don't Know 6.00 5 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q68 Q68 IMPORTANCE-HIGH LEVEL OF EDUCATION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Very Important 1.00 414 41.4 41.4 41.4 2 2.00 198 19.8 19.8 61.2 3 3.00 214 21.4 21.4 82.6 4 4.00 82 8.2 8.2 90.8 5 - Not At All Impor 5.00 82 8.2 8.2 99.0 Don't Know 6.00 10 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 37 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q69 Q69 IMPORTANCE-JOINING RELATIVES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Very Important 1.00 251 25.1 25.1 25.1 2 2.00 198 19.8 19.8 44.9 3 3.00 295 29.5 29.5 74.4 4 4.00 120 12.0 12.0 86.4 5 - Not At All Impor 5.00 123 12.3 12.3 98.7 Don't Know 6.00 13 1.3 1.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q70 Q70 IMPORTANCE-KNOW FRENCH Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Very Important 1.00 457 45.7 45.7 45.7 2 2.00 183 18.3 18.3 64.0 3 3.00 192 19.2 19.2 83.2 4 4.00 65 6.5 6.5 89.7 5 - Not At All Impor 5.00 99 9.9 9.9 99.6 Don't Know 6.00 4 .4 .4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 38 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q71 Q71 IMPORTANCE-INVESTING IN QUEBEC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Very Important 1.00 553 55.3 55.3 55.3 2 2.00 202 20.2 20.2 75.5 3 3.00 138 13.8 13.8 89.3 4 4.00 53 5.3 5.3 94.6 5 - Not At All Impor 5.00 48 4.8 4.8 99.4 Don't Know 6.00 6 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q72 Q72 IMPORTANCE-JOINING IMMEDIATE FAMILY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Very Important 1.00 322 32.2 32.2 32.2 2 2.00 214 21.4 21.4 53.6 3 3.00 265 26.5 26.5 80.1 4 4.00 103 10.3 10.3 90.4 5 - Not At All Impor 5.00 81 8.1 8.1 98.5 Don't Know 6.00 15 1.5 1.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 39 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q73 Q73 IMPORTANCE-TO SETTLE OUT OF MONTRL Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent 1 - Very Important 1.00 282 28.2 28.2 28.2 2 2.00 185 18.5 18.5 46.7 3 3.00 267 26.7 26.7 73.4 4 4.00 103 10.3 10.3 83.7 5 - Not At All Impor 5.00 135 13.5 13.5 97.2 Don't Know 6.00 28 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q74 Q74 AGREEMENT-CUTTINGS IN HEALTH CARE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Agree 1.00 204 20.4 20.4 20.4 Somewhat Agree 2.00 344 34.4 34.4 54.8 Somewhat Disagree 3.00 199 19.9 19.9 74.7 Strongly Disagree 4.00 214 21.4 21.4 96.1 Not Sure/Don't Know 5.00 39 3.9 3.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 40 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q75 Q75 HEALTH CARE SERVICES TO BE CUT Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Abortions/Vasectomie 1.00 10 1.0 1.0 1.0 Plastic/Cosmetic Sur 2.00 109 10.9 10.9 11.9 Reduce Number Of Vis 3.00 90 9.0 9.0 20.9 Having User Fees 4.00 15 1.5 1.5 22.4 Free Prescriptions/M 5.00 13 1.3 1.3 23.7 Abuse Of Emergency S 6.00 30 3.0 3.0 26.7 No Services Should B 7.00 192 19.2 19.2 45.9 Services To People O 8.00 4 .4 .4 46.3 Hospital Stays/Hospi 9.00 7 .7 .7 47.0 Hospital Meals 10.00 3 .3 .3 47.3 Treatments Outside C 11.00 4 .4 .4 47.7 Dental Services 12.00 27 2.7 2.7 50.4 Cancer Treatments 13.00 2 .2 .2 50.6 Eye Examinations/Opt 14.00 10 1.0 1.0 51.6 Alcohol/Drug/Smoking 15.00 5 .5 .5 52.1 Other 88.00 45 4.5 4.5 56.6 Don't Know 99.00 434 43.4 43.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q76 Q76 ACCESS TO HEALTH CARE SERVICES Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Equal Access 1.00 715 71.5 71.5 71.5 Discriminates On Bas 2.00 241 24.1 24.1 95.6 Not Sure/Don't Know 3.00 44 4.4 4.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 41 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q77 Q77 IMPORTANT ENV'TL PROBLEM IN QUEBEC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acid Rain 1.00 23 2.3 2.3 2.3 Air Pollution 2.00 114 11.4 11.4 13.7 Tree Conservation 3.00 23 2.3 2.3 16.0 Ozone Layer 4.00 11 1.1 1.1 17.1 Lack Of Recycling 5.00 11 1.1 1.1 18.2 Water Pollution 6.00 352 35.2 35.2 53.4 Industrial Pollution 7.00 109 10.9 10.9 64.3 Noise Pollution 8.00 3 .3 .3 64.6 Landfills/Garbage Co 9.00 19 1.9 1.9 66.5 Pollution In General 10.00 137 13.7 13.7 80.2 Exploitation Of Natu 11.00 4 .4 .4 80.6 Poor Government 12.00 3 .3 .3 80.9 Great Whale/Hydro Pr 13.00 2 .2 .2 81.1 Other 88.00 47 4.7 4.7 85.8 Don't Know 99.00 142 14.2 14.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q78 Q78 RESPONSIBLE-ADDRESS ENV'TL PROBLEM Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Federal Government 1.00 186 18.6 18.6 18.6 Quebec Government 2.00 236 23.6 23.6 42.2 Municipal Government 3.00 72 7.2 7.2 49.4 Private Sector 4.00 79 7.9 7.9 57.3 Local Community 5.00 33 3.3 3.3 60.6 Individuals 6.00 226 22.6 22.6 83.2 Other 7.00 102 10.2 10.2 93.4 Don't Know/Refused 8.00 66 6.6 6.6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 42 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q79 Q79 PRIORITY-SOLVING ENV'TL PROBLEMS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Acid Rain 1.00 13 1.3 1.3 1.3 Air Pollution 2.00 73 7.3 7.3 8.6 Ozone Layer 3.00 11 1.1 1.1 9.7 Recycling 4.00 24 2.4 2.4 12.1 Water Pollution 5.00 390 39.0 39.0 51.1 Industrial Pollution 6.00 111 11.1 11.1 62.2 Noise Pollution 7.00 4 .4 .4 62.6 Landfills/Garbage Co 8.00 27 2.7 2.7 65.3 Exploitatn Of Natura 9.00 24 2.4 2.4 67.7 Pollution In General 10.00 83 8.3 8.3 76.0 Wildlife Preservatio 11.00 2 .2 .2 76.2 Impact Of Pollution 12.00 7 .7 .7 76.9 The Unemployed 13.00 5 .5 .5 77.4 The Poor 14.00 3 .3 .3 77.7 Other 88.00 41 4.1 4.1 81.8 Don't Know 99.00 182 18.2 18.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q80 Q80 SUGGESTED GOV CASINO GAMING POLICY Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent No Casino Gaming At 1.00 152 15.2 15.2 15.2 Allow Privately Owne 2.00 286 28.6 28.6 43.8 Only Allow Governmen 3.00 522 52.2 52.2 96.0 Not Sure/Don't Know 4.00 40 4.0 4.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 43 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q81 Q81 CASINO GAMING ON ABORIGINAL LANDS Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Strongly Support 1.00 68 6.8 6.8 6.8 Somewhat Support 2.00 210 21.0 21.0 27.8 Somewhat Oppose 3.00 214 21.4 21.4 49.2 Strongly Oppose 4.00 459 45.9 45.9 95.1 Don't Know 5.00 20 2.0 2.0 97.1 No Opinion 6.00 29 2.9 2.9 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q82 Q82 EDUCATION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Elementary School 1.00 66 6.6 6.6 6.6 High School 2.00 336 33.6 33.6 40.2 Community College 3.00 292 29.2 29.2 69.4 Some University 4.00 84 8.4 8.4 77.8 Completed University 5.00 217 21.7 21.7 99.5 Refused 6.00 5 .5 .5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 44 16:06:49 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q83 Q83 OCCUPATION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent White Collar 1.00 259 25.9 25.9 25.9 Grey Collar 2.00 194 19.4 19.4 45.3 Blue Collar 3.00 182 18.2 18.2 63.5 Student 4.00 99 9.9 9.9 73.4 Farmer 5.00 7 .7 .7 74.1 Homemaker 7.00 85 8.5 8.5 82.6 Retired 8.00 120 12.0 12.0 94.6 Unemployed 9.00 45 4.5 4.5 99.1 Other 88.00 1 .1 .1 99.2 Refused 99.00 8 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q84 Q84 HOUSEHOLD INCOME Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Less Than $25,000 1.00 266 26.6 26.6 26.6 $25,000 To $34,999 2.00 220 22.0 22.0 48.6 $35,000 To $44,999 3.00 151 15.1 15.1 63.7 $45,000 To $54,999 4.00 123 12.3 12.3 76.0 $55,000 To $64,999 5.00 76 7.6 7.6 83.6 $65,000 To $74,999 6.00 41 4.1 4.1 87.7 More Than $75,000 7.00 68 6.8 6.8 94.5 Refused 8.00 55 5.5 5.5 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 45 16:06:50 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q85A Q85A MOTHER TONGUE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent French 1.00 876 87.6 87.6 87.6 English 2.00 68 6.8 6.8 94.4 Bilingual 3.00 3 .3 .3 94.7 Italian 5.00 10 1.0 1.0 95.7 German 6.00 6 .6 .6 96.3 Portuguese 7.00 3 .3 .3 96.6 Punjabi 8.00 1 .1 .1 96.7 Spanish 9.00 6 .6 .6 97.3 Chinese 10.00 3 .3 .3 97.6 Greek 11.00 5 .5 .5 98.1 Lebanese 12.00 1 .1 .1 98.2 Aboriginal 13.00 1 .1 .1 98.3 Cambodian 14.00 2 .2 .2 98.5 Romanian 15.00 1 .1 .1 98.6 Hindi 16.00 2 .2 .2 98.8 Polish 17.00 1 .1 .1 98.9 Arabic 18.00 1 .1 .1 99.0 Ukrainian 19.00 1 .1 .1 99.1 Other 88.00 3 .3 .3 99.4 Refused 99.00 6 .6 .6 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q86 Q86 CONFIDN-GRANDKIDS USE MOTHER TONGUE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Very Confident 1.00 659 65.9 65.9 65.9 Somewhat Confident 2.00 222 22.2 22.2 88.1 Not Very Confident 3.00 69 6.9 6.9 95.0 Not At All Confident 4.00 22 2.2 2.2 97.2 Don't Know/Refused 5.00 28 2.8 2.8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 46 16:06:50 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q87 Q87 FUTURE OF FRENCH LANGUAGE IN QUEBEC Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Very Secure 1.00 341 34.1 34.1 34.1 Somewhat Secure 2.00 430 43.0 43.0 77.1 Not Very Secure 3.00 201 20.1 20.1 97.2 Not At All Secure 4.00 18 1.8 1.8 99.0 Don't Know/Not Sure 5.00 10 1.0 1.0 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q88 Q88 URBAN/RURAL RESIDENCE Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Urban 1.00 723 72.3 72.3 72.3 Rural 2.00 269 26.9 26.9 99.2 Not Sure/Don't Know 3.00 8 .8 .8 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q89 Q89 URBAN/RURAL (BY POSTAL CODE) Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Urban 1.00 714 71.4 71.4 71.4 Rural 2.00 193 19.3 19.3 90.7 Don't Know 99.00 93 9.3 9.3 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 47 16:06:50 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q8A Q8A IMPRESSION-DANIEL JOHNSON Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Very Impressed 1.00 38 3.8 3.8 3.8 Somewhat Impressed 2.00 146 14.6 14.6 18.4 Neutral 3.00 280 28.0 28.0 46.4 Not Too Impressed 4.00 190 19.0 19.0 65.4 Not At All Impressed 5.00 274 27.4 27.4 92.8 Don't Know 11.00 72 7.2 7.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q90 Q90 REGION Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Montreal 20.00 463 46.3 46.3 46.3 Quebec City 21.00 95 9.5 9.5 55.8 Rest Of Quebec 22.00 442 44.2 44.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Q91 Q91 GENDER Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent Male 1.00 498 49.8 49.8 49.8 Female 2.00 502 50.2 50.2 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 48 16:06:50 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 File: SPSS/PC+ Q92 Q92 LANGUAGE OF INTERVIEW Valid Cum Value Label Value Frequency Percent Percent Percent French 1.00 936 93.6 93.6 93.6 English 2.00 64 6.4 6.4 100.0 ------- ------- ------- Total 1000 100.0 100.0 Valid cases 1000 Missing cases 0 25 Feb 99 Pollara: Regard sur le Quebec, 1994 Page 49 16:06:50 Carleton University SUN SPARC Solaris 2.3 Preceding task required .47 seconds CPU time; .51 seconds elapsed. 6 0 save outfile 'spss.sys'. Time stamp on saved file: 25 FEB 99 16:06:50 File contains 104 variables, 832 bytes per case before compression 1,000 cases were written to spss.sys Preceding task required .23 seconds CPU time; .38 seconds elapsed. 7 0 finish. 7 command lines read. 0 errors detected. 0 warnings issued. 1 seconds CPU time. 2 seconds elapsed time. End of job.